Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1953

reference
46-tree-1
name
1953
tree-preservation-order

undefined

46-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.015716 50.900793)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.015659 50.900787,-1.015662 50.900798,-1.015670 50.900808,-1.015682 50.900816,-1.015698 50.900821,-1.015716 50.900823,-1.015733 50.900822,-1.015749 50.900817,-1.015762 50.900809,-1.015770 50.900799,-1.015773 50.900788,-1.015771 50.900777,-1.015763 50.900767,-1.015750 50.900759,-1.015735 50.900753,-1.015717 50.900751,-1.015699 50.900753,-1.015683 50.900758,-1.015671 50.900766,-1.015662 50.900776,-1.015659 50.900787)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL